范畴化理论研究转变的动因分析——基于语言学史两线之争实质的视角  

An Analysis of Motivations for the Transition of the Theoretical Study of Categorization——From the Perspective of the Analogy-Anomaly Controversies in the History of Linguistics

作　　者：刘江[1] 

机构地区：[1]大连大学英语学院,辽宁大连116622

出　　处：《大连大学学报》2013年第4期136-145,共10页Journal of Dalian University

基　　金：大连市社会科学院项目(2011DLSK025);大连大学博士启动项目;大连大学青年博士专项基金项目

摘　　要：语言学史两线之争在于,是否重视言语动态性和变异性的研究。从语言学史两线之争的角度来看,从经典范畴化到原型范畴化以及从原型范畴化到梯度范畴化关键在于,如何对待言语的动态性和变异性的研究;既承认经典范畴化又承认原型范畴化的梯度范畴化充分体现了矛盾的辩证统一。相关研究表明,既强调意义又强调形式的某种构式语法研究是梯度范畴化无法回避的课题。The controversies between the two ＂camps＂ in the history of linguistics, known as analogy-anomaly controversies, lie in whether dynamics and variability of the speech are emphasized in the research. Seen form the perspective of analogy-anomaly controversies, the category theory developing from classical categorization to prototype categorization and to gradient categorization consists in how to deal with dynamics and variability of the speech in the research; the gradient categorization that acknowledges both classical categorization and prototype categorization fully reflects the dialectical unity of the opposites. The related research shows that some study of construction grammar that emphasizes both meaning and form may be a more appropriate model for gradient categorization.

关 键 词：两线之争 范畴化研究的转变 动因 构式研究 

分 类 号：H0-09[语言文字—语言学]