检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:渠扬[1]
出 处:《浙江体育科学》2013年第5期74-77,84,共5页Zhejiang Sport Science
基 金:浙江省教育厅基金项目(Y201121155)
摘 要:为全面了解参加体育课大学生的群体凝聚力的基本情况与差异,基于群体心理学的视角,通过问卷调查和数据统计等研究方法,对浙江省高校体育课的大学生进行了群体凝聚力的调查与分析,并探索了高校体育课发展的影响路径。结果表明:高校体育课的大学生凝聚力的总体水平不高,不同的项目、性别、年级和专业之间的大学生群体凝聚力有显著差异。拓展、篮球、足球和排球项目有较好的凝聚力,男生比女生表现出更好的团结氛围,大学新生的凝聚力较老生水平差,文科比理工科学生的凝聚力水平差,并针对调查的情况对高校体育课提出相应的建议和策略。In order to understand the situations and the differences of the group cohesion of the college students partic- ipating in the physical education, from the perspective of group psychology this study investigates and analyzes the group cohesion of Zhejiang province college physical education students, and explores the effect path of the develop- ment of the college physical education. The results show that= the college students~ overall group cohesion level is not high. The group cohesion differs greatly among the college students from different projects and grades, and of differ- ent genders. And there is difference in the group cohesion among the college students from different majors. There are better cohesion in the games of outward bound, basketball, football and volleyball, especially among boy players than girl players. The cohesion of the first year students is worse than that of the sophomores, iuniors and seniors. Science and engineering major students are better than arts major students in cohesion. According to the survey, this study aims to put forward relevant suggestions for the college physical education.
分 类 号:G804.85[文化科学—运动人体科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117