检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广东医学院病理生理学教研室,湛江524001
出 处:《中华医学教育杂志》2013年第4期568-570,共3页Chinese Journal of Medical Education
基 金:中华医学会医学教育分会和中国高等教育学会医学教育专业委员会2010年度医学教育研究立项课题(2010-13-38)
摘 要:为了观察研讨式教学方法的教学效果,在病理生理学教学中进行了教改实践.实验组采用研讨式教学方法,对照组采用传统教学方法;两组学生以综合能力、观念和考试成绩为指标进行对比分析.结果显示,研讨式教学方法有利于强化学生的主体意识并提高学生学习积极性、巩固理论知识、培养学生的临床思维能力及分析和解决问题的能力,而其考试成绩却没有变化,甚至比对照组学生的总成绩稍低.实验提示,研讨式教学方法是一种有效的素质教育方法,但有待完善.To explore the teaching effect of application of study-discuss teaching methodology in pathophysiology teaching,the students were taught by study-discuss teaching methodology for experimental class which the index of comprehensive ability,concept and examining results was contrasted or aggregately analyzed,and by traditional teaching methodology for control class.The results showed that the application of study-discuss teaching methodology was helpful in strengthening the students,individual consciousness,mobilizing their initiative,and improving their ability of problem analyzing and solving,but the examining results were no change,or lower than the students of control class.The results of the experiments hinted that the study-discuss teaching methodology is an effect method of the quality education and would be further improved.
分 类 号:G642[文化科学—高等教育学] R-4[文化科学—教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145