检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西南科技大学法学院 [2]西南科技大学应用技术学院 [3]电子科技大学法律系
出 处:《北方法学》2013年第5期124-129,共6页Northern Legal Science
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目"西部地区农村群体性纠纷及其解决机制研究"(项目编号09XFX032)的研究成果
摘 要:刑事诉讼中的证据裁判原则要求认定案件事实必须依据证据,证据应具有证据能力且需依据法定程序进行审查判断,运用证据证明案件事实要达到法定的证明标准。依证据裁判原则的基本要求进行审视,我国新刑事诉讼法在证据制度的规定上有了长足的进步,但仍存在不少问题与缺憾,主要表现为立法条文过于粗疏、操作难问题依旧突出、诸多内容遗漏等,这些有待进一步充实入法。The doctrine of evidence - based adjudication in criminal litigations requires that case facts should be determined on evidence, which should be admissible, and to be examined and judged by legal procedures. Such process should satisfy the statutory standards to prove. In the review of the Revised Criminal Procedure Law based on doctrine of evidence - based adjudication, regulations on evidence have been improved yet still with problems and imperfections, such as the legislative provisions are rather general than specific; some provisions are hard to apply and many items failed to be regulated. All of these imperfections should be corrected and the legislation should be improved accordingly.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222