民国四川基层社会诉讼话语变迁研究——以三台档案为依据  

On the Transition of Litigation Discourse of Society at the Basic Levels in Sichuan Province during the Republic of China——Based on the Santai Archives

作　　者：陈长宁[1] 

机构地区：[1]四川大学法学院,四川成都610207

出　　处：《西华师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2013年第4期26-34,共9页Journal of China West Normal University:Philosophy & Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社科基金项目(09BZS017)

摘　　要：清代的诉讼多被学者称为冤抑诉讼。民国时期冤抑诉讼在多大程度上向近现代的权利诉讼转型,是一个亟待考察的问题。通过民国三台档案,可以看到冤抑诉讼与权利诉讼的话语并存于四川基层社会,两者并非二元对立,大量过渡类型的存在说明了两者之间的冲突与融合。要实现诉讼话语的变革,需要整个司法场域中的人们更新其常识与知识,并不能一蹴而就。通过对四川基层社会的诉讼话语变迁的研究可以清晰地看见基层社会在法制变革中滞后于经济较发达的城市而呈现出的独特面貌。这也可以作为考察中国法制近代化过程中内部张力真实存在的一个样本。Scholars call the legal action in the Qing dynasty the aggrieved litigation.The aggrieved litigation transformed into the rights protection litigation with the development of legal system in the republic of China.But it is a question that to what extent this transition happened.Based on the Santai archieve,we can see the discourse of the aggrieved litigation and the rights protection litigation both existed in that time.The two kinds of discourses of litigation conflicted and fused with each other,rather than were lost in binary oppositions.In order to realize the transition of litigation discourse,People in the same field should renew their knowledge and common sense for it cannot be accomplished in an action.We can clearly observe the unique appearance of the society at the basic levels whose development of legal system fall behind the cities through the transition of litigation discourse in Santai archives.This could also help us to distinguish the internal tension during the modernization of legal system.

关 键 词：民国四川 基层社会 诉讼话语 冤抑诉讼 权利诉讼 

分 类 号：K207[历史地理—历史学]