检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:林田[1] 刘雪莲[2] 蓝宇涛[1] 王娟[1] 薛漫清[1]
机构地区:[1]广东药学院护理学院,广州市510310 [2]中山大学附属第三医院,广州市510089
出 处:《中华护理教育》2013年第8期348-350,共3页Chinese Journal of Nursing Education
摘 要:目的探讨情境合作考试在护理专业本科生基础护理操作考核中的应用。方法选取某校2010级243名护理专业本科生作为研究对象,实行情境合作考试模式。结束后评价该考试的难度、信度和效度,并用自设问卷调查学生对情境合作考试的评价。结果情境合作考试难度系数为0.775,Cronbach'sα系数为0.749,与操作考试平时成绩和理论考试成绩的相关系数分别为0.646和0.479(P<0.01)。78.2%的学生认为情境合作考试优于传统的基础护理操作考试。结论情境合作考试应用于基础护理操作考核具有科学性和可行性。Objective To explore the application of collaborative group testing in situation for nursing undergraduates in basic nursing skills test.Methods Totally 243 undergraduate nursing students were chosen to take basic nursing skills test in groups in a given situation.After the test,the difficulty,reliability and validity of the test was analyzed.The students were investigated with a self-designed questionnaire about their appraisal on the test.Results The difficulty coefficient was 0.775, Cronbach's a coefficient was 0.749.Pearson correlation coefficient between the performance in the test with the score of performance in normal time was 0.646,and with the score of theoretical test was 0.479(P0.01).About 78.2%students considered collaborative group testing in situation was superior to traditional testing.Conclusion Collaborative group testing in situation is scientific and practical in basic nursing skills test.
分 类 号:G642[文化科学—高等教育学] R47-4[文化科学—教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15