检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《重庆大学学报(社会科学版)》2013年第4期137-143,共7页Journal of Chongqing University(Social Science Edition)
基 金:国家社科基金项目"西部地区农村群体性纠纷及其解决机制研究"(09XFX032)
摘 要:从法律文本变迁的角度审视,中国行政诉讼受案范围呈现出逐渐扩大的趋势。通过对F市基层法院受案具体数据的分析,得出结论:实践中行政诉讼受案范围整体呈不断扩大的态势,但效果不如预期明显;行政诉讼立法对受案范围的规定,特别是抽象行政行为不可诉之规定,在一定程度上妨碍了民众的权利救济;实践中法院受理的案件类型逐渐向非治安行政案件集中,反映了中国政府角色转变的时代特征。From the angle of the change of legal texts, the scope of administrative litigation of china presents a gradually expanded trend. Based on the analysis on the judicial data from the grass-roots court in F city, it is not difficult to draw the following conclusions: the scope of accepting cases in administrative litigation expands on the whole situation, but the results is not obvious as well as expected in practice; the provisions of legislation of admin- istrative litigation concerning the scope of accepting cases obstruct the rights relief of people to some extent; the type of accepting cases in administrative litigation gradually concentrates in the un-public security administrative ca- ses, which reflects the stamp of the age that the role government plays is changing
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222