检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴庆洲[1]
出 处:《城市与区域规划研究》2013年第1期23-39,共17页Journal of Urban and Regional Planning
基 金:国家自然科学基金“中国古代城市规划、设计的哲理、学说及历史经验研究”资助项目(项目编号:50678070);国家自然科学基金资助项目“中国古城水系营建的学说及历史经验研究”(项目编号:51278197)
摘 要:文中分析了乐山古城选址的四利和一弊,其中的一弊即不利于防洪。通过对历史上乐山古城洪灾的统计和采取的防洪措施的分析研究,认为这些措施是有效的。民国38年间有七次洪灾,是由于古城防洪的城、堤破败而又无维修,外城又被拆毁之故。乐山古城防洪的历史经验可供我们参考、借鉴。This paper explores the historical flood disasters and flood control measures of Ancient Leshan City. It analyses the site selection of Leshan and comes to the conclusion that there are four advantages and one disadvantage regarding the site selection, with the disadvantage being unfavorable for flood control. Through the statistics and analysis on historical flood disasters, the flood control measures are proven effective. There were seven times of urban flood disasters in Leshan during the period of the Republic of China (1911-1949), which were caused by that the city walls and dykes were dilapidated without maintenance and the outer citywalls were demolished. The historical experience against flood disasters of Leshan can be used for our reference today.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.144