检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵志福[1]
出 处:《唐山学院学报》2013年第5期22-24,共3页Journal of Tangshan University
基 金:教育部人文社会科学西部和边疆地区青年基金项目(12XJC820001)
摘 要:随着法治的发展,人权保障越来越受重视。而我国对于诱惑侦查制度的实质合法性一直存在争议。文章基于刑法因果关系理论与犯罪心理学原理研究,提出应废除犯意诱发型诱惑侦查,并从诱惑侦查的条件及法律后果两个方面进行分析,建议规制机会提供型诱惑侦查手段。With the development of the rule of law, more and more attention is being paid to the protection of human rights. In China, the essence of the system of enticing investigation has been controversial. This paper, based on the causality of criminal law and the principles of criminal psychology, proposes to abolish intentional entraping investigation. It also suggests regulating the conditions of encouraging investigation, based on the analysis of the conditions of enticing in- vestigation and its legal consequences.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.192