MIT OCW项目与网易公开课运营模式比较研究  

A Sino-U.S. Comparison of OCW Operational Mode——the Case between MIT and Net Ease

作　　者：邓康桥[1,2] 阙澄宇[2] 

机构地区：[1]江西财经大学统计学院,江西南昌330013 [2]东北财经大学,辽宁大连116025

出　　处：《现代教育技术》2013年第9期21-24,共4页Modern Educational Technology

基　　金：教育部高等学校继续教育示范基地建设项目"基于组织的财经从业人员继续教育示范基地建设"(教高函[2011]6号);辽宁省大连市高新技术产业园区科技创新项目"非学历继续教育与培训网络化服务管理平台"(项目编号:20111087)的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：网络公开课的兴起为教育供给缺口问题的解决开辟了新途径。在北美高校发起的网络公开课以及国家精品课程的助推下,中国网络公开课代表——网易公开课也获得了迅速的发展。对中美两个网络公开课领域的典范项目——MIC OCW与网易公开课进行比较分析,有利于探索适合中国特色的开放教育资源的共享机制。通过对两个项目进行案例对比分析,发现两者在资源来源、参与方动机及运行机制等方面均具有显著的差异;网易公开课作为目前中国网络公开课的主要模式之一,其对中国未来教育资源共享机制的探索会有深远的影响。There is a huge gap between the need of social development and high education supply, which the traditional education cannot fill, and also it＇s economical un-feasible to build more college. ICT brings e-learning whose development provides a new way to even people＇s Chinese rights to be educated. Since 2001, MIT launched the OWC project and the international campaign of ORE. NETEASE is a NASDAQ listed Company which is also a reprehensive of Chinese OCW. To study the different operational mode is profound for Chinese ORE program. We put MIT and NETEASE together and do a Sino-U.S. case-level comparison, and find out that there are obvious differences in the OCW source, participants, motivation and organizational mechanism. We believe that the NETEASE maybe a prosperous way to develop Chinese ORE

关 键 词：MIT OCW 网易公开课 运营模式 

分 类 号：G40-057[文化科学—教育学原理]