检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]重庆大学法学院,重庆400045
出 处:《现代法学》2013年第5期109-119,共11页Modern Law Science
摘 要:我国刑法理论通说认为,犯罪客观要件的核心要素是危害行为。但是,危害行为说无法发挥行为概念的基本机能,在逻辑上也存在难以克服的内在矛盾。实质上,犯罪客观要件中的"行为"既不是客观上已然发生的"行为",也不可能是真正意义上的事实性行为,而只能是行为人主观罪过中的行为的一个侧面———行为客观方面具有或应该具有的自然属性或特征,这也是它与刑法中相关行为概念的本质区别。犯罪构成各要件间的辨证关系决定了实践中对犯罪客观要件中"行为"的认定应结合犯罪主体要件、主观罪过内容和犯罪对象进行。Harmful action is considered to be the key factor in the objective elements of crime by the traditional criminal law theory in our country, which nevertheless impedes the fundamental functions of the action concept and is intrinsically illogic. The "action" as an objective element of the crime is neither a happened action, nor a true and whole action. It is consequently only one aspect of a criminal action in the subjective sinessentially the natural attributes or characteristics that an action does or ought to possess in the objective aspect, which substantially distinguishes it from other concepts of action. The "action" as an objective element of the crime should be identified in coherence with the subject elements, the subjective elements and the object of crime based on their dialectical relation as elements of the crime constitution.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.143.110.248