公诉案件中当事人和解协议效力扩张及法律规制  

The Effectiveness Expansion and Legal Regulation of Settlement Agreement in the Case of Public Prosecution

作　　者：姚显森[1] 

机构地区：[1]河南大学法学院,河南开封475001

出　　处：《现代法学》2013年第5期120-133,共14页Modern Law Science

基　　金：2009年度国家社科基金项目"法官决策机制"(09BFX085)

摘　　要：公诉案件中当事人和解协议对公安司法机关具有约束力,协议内容和违约责任超出了普通民事协议的范围。当事人和解协议效力扩张具有理论依据、文化渊源和实践基础,还具有公正和效益价值,但也面临加害方以钱赎罪赎刑、被害方借罪借刑讹钱、追诉方借"议"枉法、裁判方借"议"擅断等多重风险。为依法防控这些风险,应完善和解程序,明确和解协议的附条件民事合同属性,将当事人达成和解协议规定为法定量刑情节和不起诉的法定依据之一,规定协议无效时无过错方可以要求过错方承担增加损害的民事赔偿责任或返还协议所得,规定和解过程中的事实陈述可以作为民事自认的特殊表现形式及适用民事简易程序的重要条件。In the case of public prosecution, the settlement agreement has binding force upon the public security organs. The agreement contents and liability for breach of contract are beyond the range of ordinary civil agreement. Agreement effectiveness expansion has its own theoretical basis, cultural origin and practical foundation, which can help achieve justice and effectiveness. However, it can also be abused by the injuring party to replace crime and penalty with money, abused by the victim to blackmail money with crime and penal- ty, abused by the prosecutor to corrupt in the name of ＂settlement＂ and abused by the judge to reach an arbi- trary decision in the name of ＂settlement＂. To prevent the above risks, settlement agreement should be improved as follows ： to clarify settlement agreement as a conditional civil agreement ; to make settlement agreement one of the foundations for sentencing and not prosecuting; non-fault party has right to claim compensation against fault party or return any gain from the agreement, when the agreement is void; the representation made in the course of settlement can be regarded as a special way of civil confession and can be applied to simply civil procedure.

关 键 词：和解协议 协议效力扩张 法律规制 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]