检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴凡明[1]
出 处:《井冈山大学学报(社会科学版)》2013年第5期28-32,41,共6页Journal of Jinggangshan University(Social Sciences)
基 金:国家社科基金项目"忠孝仁义与汉代法制研究"(项目编号:10BZX061)
摘 要:先秦时期儒法两家都不反对忠孝道德,但是二者在忠孝观上有着根本的区别,体现在人性认同上,儒家以人性善为其忠孝观的理论基础,法家的忠孝观建立在人性恶的基础上;在忠与孝的关系上,儒家认为忠孝合一,法家认为忠孝相互矛盾;儒家持相对主义伦理观,强调君臣、父子的权利与义务,法家持绝对主义伦理观,强调君、父的绝对权威;在忠孝道德的实现方式上,儒家主张道德教化,法家提倡法律强制。Neither Confucians nor Fa School in pre-Qin age dejected moralities of loyalty and filial piety. But their ideas on the issue are fundamentally different from each other. The differences include: in respect of human nature, Confucians base their idea on natural goodness, while Fa School on natural evilness; in terms of the interrelationship between loyalty and filial piety, Confucians believe in consistence between loyalty and filial piety, while Fa School in conflicts between the two; Confucians hold relative ethics and emphasizes the mutual duties and rights between king/father and minister/son, while Fa School holds absolute ethics and emphasizes the absolute authority of the former; Confucians argue for realizing morality through moral education while Fas School claim through legal enforcement.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222