作为方法论的法律诠释学  

Legal Hermeneutics as a Methodology

作　　者：肖恒[1] 

机构地区：[1]厦门大学法学院,福建厦门361005

出　　处：《福建教育学院学报》2013年第4期31-34,共4页Journal of Fujian Institute of Education

摘　　要：由于立法数量的增加和司法问题的凸显,传统的法律解释学或法律诠释学开始在中国成为一门显学,但是他们无一例外都被安排在法律方法论项下进行教学和研究,然而现代意义上的法律诠释学的理论基础却是解释学的本体论转向所带来的哲学解释学。本体论与方法论的纠缠意味着伽达默尔的哲学解释学(或诠释学)在从哲学领域进入法学领域的过程中产生了困难,这种困难是由立法中心主义与用法中心主义立场的差异所产生的。文章通过对这个问题的厘清为相关问题的讨论提供一个最低限度的共识。Due to the increasing number of hermeneutics become a famous school in China. But ology in teaching and researching. The theoretical legislation and the distinctness of the judicial issues, legal all of them have been arranged under the title of legal method- basis of legal hermeneutics in modem sense is, however, the hermeneutics brought by the philosophical shift. The entanglement of ontology and methodology means that some dif- ficulty appears when Gadamer＇s Philosophical Hermeneutics get from the field of philosophy into the field of ju- risprudence, and these difficulties are caused by the difference between the positions of the legislation centrism and the enforcing centrism. This paper tries to provide a minimum consensus for the discussion of related problems by making this question clear.

关 键 词：法律诠释学 本体论 立法中心主义 

分 类 号：D90[政治法律—法学理论]