“极者至极”亦或以“中”训“极”——试论朱陆二人对“极”字的解释  

“Jizhezhiji” or “Zhong” ——An Analysis of Zhu's and Lu's Interpretations of “Ji”

作　　者：赵玫[1] 

机构地区：[1]西北民族大学马克思主义学院,甘肃兰州730000

出　　处：《齐齐哈尔大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2013年第5期103-105,共3页Journal of Qiqihar University(Philosophy & Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：朱子与陆象山二人就无极太极问题产生争论,在这场争论中双方对"极"一字的考察略显支离,象山认同梭山的观点以"中"训"太极",朱子则将其视为"至极",然而这场争论的实质是两者在义理上的差别。There is an argument between Zhuzi and Lu Xiangshan about Wuji and Taiji in which both of their interpretations of ＂Ji＂ are slightly disorganized：Lu agrees with Suoshan to the interpretation of ＂Zhong＂ while Zhu interprets it as ＂zhiji＂. In fact,the essence of this argument is their differences in the interpretation of the connotation of ＂Ji＂.

关 键 词：极 中 至极 

分 类 号：H139[语言文字—汉语]