检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:裴卫静
机构地区:[1]山东省德州市平原县人民医院,山东253100
出 处:《当代医学》2013年第28期61-62,共2页Contemporary Medicine
摘 要:目的比较腹腔镜与开腹子宫肌壁间肌瘤剔除手术的临床疗效。方法选择2010年1月-2012年1月期间进行治疗的子宫肌壁间肌瘤患者144例,将患者随机分为观察组和对照组,各72例。观察组患者采用腹腔镜手术方法进行手术,对照组患者采取常规开腹就留剔除手术。结果观察组患者住院时间和出血量都明显低于对照组([7.4±1.6)d比(11.3±1.8)d,(66±24)mL比(98±45)mL(]P<0.05)。观察组患者手术后发热发生率为5.56%,低于对照组的30.56%,两组比较差异有统计学意义。结论与传统手术比较,腹腔镜手术在治疗子宫肌壁间肌瘤疗效好,安全性高。Objective To compare the efficacy of laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy intramural myomectomy surgery. Methods From January 2010 to January 2012 in our hospital, 144 patients with intramural uterine fibroids were divided into observation group and control group. The observation group were treated with laparoscopic surgery surgery, control group were given conventional laparotomy stay removed surgery. Results The hospitalization time and the amount of bleeding were significantly lower than the control group [(7.4 ± 1.6) d ratio (11.3 ± 1.8)d, (66 ± 24) mL ratio (98± 45) mL] (P 〈0.05). The patients after surgery fever incidence 5.56%, 30.56% lower than in the control group, the difference was statistically significant. Conclusion Compared with traditional surgery ,the laparoscopic surgery is effective in the treatment of uterine intramural fibroids, and has better security.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33