检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《中国健康心理学杂志》2013年第9期1360-1362,共3页China Journal of Health Psychology
摘 要:目的了解心理护理对功能性消化不良的疗效和对不良情绪的影响。方法 86例患者随机分为研究组和对照组,研究组给予心理护理,对照组常规护理,疗效以治疗前后消化道症状的改变情况评定。不良情绪采用抑郁自评量表(SDS)、焦虑自评量表(SAS)在治疗前、治疗1周、3周、6周时评定。结果 6周后研究组有效率83.78%,对照组有效率为74.28%,两组有效率无统计学差异(χ2=0.98,P>0.05)。SDS评分均在第3周时差异有统计学意义(t=2.27,P<0.05),SAS评分均在第3周时差异有统计学意义(t=2.14,P<0.05)。结论短期心理护理未能提高患者的疗效,但能减轻患者的抑郁、焦虑情绪。Objective To investigate the influence of psychological nursing on the curative effects and unhealthy emotion in pa- tients with functional dyspepsia(FD). Methods A total of 86 patients with FD were randomly enrolled experiment group that ac- cepted psychological nursing and contrast group that accepted regular nursing. Clinical efficacy was evaluated according to the changes of digestive tract symptom before and after treatment. Unhealthy emotion was evaluated with self-rating depression scale (SDS)and self-rating anxiety scale(SAS)before treatment and at the end of lst,3th,6th week after treatment. Results After 6- week treatment ,the effective rate was 88. 78 % in experiment group and 74.28 % in contrast group respectively,there was no sig- nificant difference between two groups (Zz: O. 98,P〈 0. 05). At the end of 3th ,there was significant difference between two groups in scores of SDS (t=2.27,P〈0.05)and SAS(t=2.14,P〈0.05). Conclusion Short-time psychological nursing can not improve the curative effects,but can reduce depression and anxiety in patients with functional dyspepsia.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.104