检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《河北法学》2013年第10期23-31,共9页Hebei Law Science
摘 要:当食品安全事故发生后,舆论大多把焦点集中在对受害者的赔偿问题上。因为,食品安全事故直接侵害的是消费者的生命权、健康权。毕竟,生命权和健康权是大于一切的,所以,对受害人的人身损害赔偿往往成为食品安全事故的着眼点和落脚点。然而,尽管《食品安全法》规定了民事赔偿责任优先、十倍赔偿等来保障受害人的权益,但实践中,食品安全侵权案件中受害人人身损害赔偿的实现仍然存在很多法律障碍,比如民事赔偿优先原则的实施问题、食品安全侵权责任的归责原则问题、损害赔偿的范围问题、惩罚性赔偿的合理性问题等等,理顺这些立法上的问题,不仅是构建食品安全保障机制的需要,更是救济受害人、保护消费者的需要。In the situation where a food safety accident happens, public opinion always focuses on compensation for the victims, because the food safety accidents damage people' s life and health. A healthy life is the most basic and most important requirement for every person, so how to compensate the victim is the key problem in a food safety tort case. However, in practice, it is very difficult for victims to gain damage compensation in food safety accident cases, because the relevant legal system is not perfect enough. There are lots of legal obstacles which prevent victims from obtaining compensation in food safety tort situation. To remove these legal obstacles is not only necessary for the construction of food security mechanism but also necessary for rescuing victims and protecting consumers.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117