期后背书制度新解  

New Interpretation of Endorsement after Maturity

作　　者：郭站红[1] 

机构地区：[1]宁波大学法学院,浙江宁波325211

出　　处：《法律科学（西北政法大学学报）》2013年第5期101-107,共7页Science of Law：Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law

基　　金：国家社科基金项目(09BFX054);宁波市社科规划项目(G12-XK-09)

摘　　要：期后背书在不同立法例上存在不同的界定,它们体现了不同的立法观念。我国票据法杂糅着不同立法例上的期后背书制度,忽略了该制度背后隐藏的票据法理念,造成了不当后果。基于票据法关于期后背书规定的比较分析,我国票据法关于期后背书的规定应予以修正,重新界定期后背书,确立期后背书与期前背书的推定规则,并在确定期后背书法律效果为一般债权转让效力的基础上,赋予特殊情形下期后背书之被背书人主张善意取得的权利。Endorsement after maturity is differently defined in the world, which reflects different dominant concept of legislation. The Commercial Instrument Law of PRC absorbed the merits and different legislation styles of the other country, however, it ignored the concept behind endorsement after maturity, thus caused inappropriate consequences. The article suggests that endorsement after maturity should be redefined, overdue endorsement and the endorsement that made after ma- turity should be differentiated from each other. In addition, the article also recommends that the holder who acquired the in- strument based on the special circumstances should be given the fights of good faith acquisition.

关 键 词：期后背书 到期日 拒绝证书 付款提示期限 

分 类 号：DF414[政治法律—经济法学]