检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李锦辉[1,2]
机构地区:[1]广东海洋大学法学院 [2]中国政法大学
出 处:《中国政法大学学报》2013年第5期23-33,158,共11页Journal Of CUPL
摘 要:社会在是否帮扶摔倒者这一事件上会自发形成一个为社会所承认的低水平救助均衡。这一低水平救助均衡是道德责任与个人利益、理性与非理性的均衡点,也是一个为社会公众实际认同的现实选择。法律无法将这一理性计算形成的均衡点提高至更高水平。而"彭宇"案判决与媒体的宣扬使得维持这一稳定的低水平均衡所需要的社会预期受到严重破坏导致均衡点偏移并最终消解。从"彭宇"案到"佛山女童"事件遵从的就是这一必然逻辑。解决这一问题的方法在于从制度上调整规则维系社会自发形成的低水平救助均衡,而不是呼吁道德救赎。The society will automatically form a self-accepted and low-leveled fall and help equilibrium from the case that if we should help the fallen.It is the equilibrium point between moral responsibility and individual benefit,between rationality and non-rationality,which is also a realistic choice made by the public.But law itself cannot upgrade the equilibrium formed by rational calculation to a higher level.But unfortunately the equilibrium was drifted and finally dispelled when the social expectation required by the stable low-leveled equilibrium was destroyed by the verdict of Pengyu Case and the media's propagation.It is inevitable logic from Pengyu Case to Foshan girl child's accident.The solution of the problem is not call for morality redemption;instead,we should adjust the system rules to the reservation of the automatically formed low level help equilibrium.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28