行政指导之司法审查透析  

Analysis of the Judicial Review of Administrative Guidance

作　　者：吴卫军[1] 汤湘燕[1] 

机构地区：[1]电子科技大学,成都611731

出　　处：《电子科技大学学报（社科版）》2013年第4期87-90,106,共5页Journal of University of Electronic Science and Technology of China(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"西部地区农村群体性纠纷及其解决机制研究"(09XFX032)

摘　　要：作为一种新型且灵活的管理手段,行政指导已大量运用于中国行政管理领域的各个方面。对行政指导进行司法审查是权力不得滥用的必然要求,也是信赖保护原则与有权利必有救济原则的应有之义。在我国当前立法中,行政指导的可诉性尚存在争议,行政指导司法审查的标准与规则缺乏。因此,应当从扩大行政诉讼受案范围、充实行政指导的实体立法、改革行政诉讼程序等方面着手完善行政指导司法审查的制度设计。As a new and flexible means of administrative management, administrative guidance has been widely used in the administrative field. The judicial review of administrative guidance is not only the inevitable requirement of no abuse of power, but also the needs of the trust protection doctrine and the principle of rights relief. In the current legislation in China, suability of administrative guidance is still controversial, and the standards and rules of judicial review of administrative guidance is lacked as well. Therefore, we should start from the measures like expanding the scope of administrative litigation, enriching the substantive legislative of administrative guidance, and reforming the administrative litigation procedure to improve the design of the system of judicial review of administrative guidance.

关 键 词：行政指导 性质 必要性 司法审查 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]