CDIC、BLB与ITI系统在口腔种植应用中的比较与评价  

CDIC, BLB and ITI planting comparison and evaluation in the application of oral cavity

作　　者：高建勇 田云霞[2] 

机构地区：[1]北京京北健永口腔医院,北京101400 [2]怀柔区中医院,北京101400

出　　处：《吉林医学》2013年第27期5541-5543,共3页Jilin Medical Journal

摘　　要：目的:评估CDIC、BLB与ITI三种系统在口腔种植应用中的有效性及安全性。方法:将接受口腔种植的1 182例患者随机均分三组,每组394例,分别使用CDIC、BLB与ITI三种系统完成种植操作,共植入种植体2 694颗。随访3年后统计并比较种植成功率、种植成功患者的满意程度及并发症发生率。结果:CDIC组、BLB组手术成功率分别为97.7%、96.8%,略高于ITI组的95.0%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);在种植成功的患者中三组满意率均在80%以上,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);三种系统术后并发症发生率极低,且差距不大。结论:CDIC、BLB种植系统种植成功率略高于ITI系统,对于一般性口腔种植手术,值得推广。Objective To evaluate CDIC,BLB and ITI three system implant efficacy in oral.Methods Randomly divided 1 182 patients received oral implants in three groups,each group of 394 cases,the use of CDIC,BLB and ITI three system were completed planting operation,2694 dental implants were implanted.After 3 years of follow-up and comparison of statistical planting satisfaction and success rate,complications of success rate of patients undergoing.Results In CDIC group, BLB group,operation success rate were 97.7%,96.8%,slightly higher than the 95% in the ITI group,the difference was statistically significant（P 〈 0.05）;in the growing success in three of the patients were more than 80% satisfaction rate,no significant difference（P 〉 0.05）;after the operation and three system complication rate is very low, and the gap is not.Conclusion CDIC,BLB implant system implant success rate is slightly higher than that of IT][ system,the general dental implant operation,worthy of promotion.

关 键 词：CDIC BLB ITI 口腔种植 

分 类 号：R783.6[医药卫生—口腔医学]