中国应确立何种金融检察政策?——基于宽严相济理念的思考  

What Kind of Financial Prosecution Policy Should China Set Up?

作　　者：林喜芬[1] 

机构地区：[1]上海交通大学凯原法学院,上海200240

出　　处：《四川师范大学学报（社会科学版）》2013年第5期26-32,共7页Journal of Sichuan Normal University(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：笔者主持的上海市浦江人才计划"论经济转型期的金融检察职能之优化--基于上海区域的实证考察"(项目编号:13PJC074)资助

摘　　要：宽严相济理念对西方金融犯罪的治理主要体现为两个维度:刑事实体法层面,量刑严苛,旨在威慑;刑事程序法层面,司法是否积极介入金融犯罪案件较为审慎,同时习惯采用辩诉交易或暂缓起诉的追诉策略。在我国,宽严相济理念之内涵及外延还存在一些争议。未来宽严相济理念对我国金融犯罪的治理,不仅应谨防严控理念与运动执法的短路相接,也应正确区分刑民纠纷界限,"抓大防小",而且有必要借鉴"实体严苛、程序灵活"的策略。In terms of financial prosecution in western Countries,the policy of temper justice with mercy is embodied in two dimensions：on the criminal law side,it emphasizes the value of deterrence through harsh sentence;on the criminal procedure law side,it emphasizes the prudence and the tactics of financial prosecution,such as deferred prosecution and plea bargaining.In China,there are still some arguments on the policy of temper justice with mercy.In terms of the potential introduction of the policy into financial crime control,three dimensions should be paid attention：the first is to be aware of the crackdown policy and sporty legal enforcement manner,the second is to clarify the boundary of criminal and civil financial dispute,and the third is to used for reference the tactic of financial crime control,i.e.,severe criminal law and flexible criminal procedure law.

关 键 词：金融检察 刑事政策 宽严相济 金融犯罪 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]