检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]天津政法管理干部学院天津262875 [2]西北政法大学陕西西安710122
出 处:《法学杂志》2013年第9期19-25,共7页Law Science Magazine
摘 要:秋审是我国历史上一项较为完备的死刑复议制度,清朝在明朝原有的基础上融入了时代特点加以完善并最终形成了具有自身特色的秋审制度。秋审对当前死刑复核程序仍然具有若干借鉴意义。Trial in Autumn was relative perfect system for reconsidering the death penalty case in the history. Basing on Ming Dynasty, reviewing death penalty case was improved in Qing Dynasty and developed a system of trial in Autumn with Epoch characteristics of epoch eventually. The paper is going to study on part of procedure of trial in Autumn and comparatively study on current reviewing system of death penalty. It is concluded that there are certain references to be taken from system of Autumn trial in Qing Dynasty by current death penalty reviewing system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.114