检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:唐治祥[1]
机构地区:[1]重庆三峡学院重庆404100
出 处:《法学杂志》2013年第9期26-33,共8页Law Science Magazine
基 金:国家社科基金一般项目“公正审判视野下的刑事卷证移送及其配套制度研究”(项目批准号:12BFX057);教育部人文社会科学研究规划基金项目“刑事卷证移送制度改革研究”(项目批准号:11YJA820068)的阶段性成果
摘 要:专门由非庭审法官对公诉是否符合法定条件预先进行审查的英美式预审制度具有防止公诉权滥用和法官庭前预断的双重功效,但其深深扎根于对抗性政治法律文化基础之上,与偏重人权保障和程序正义的价值理念以及审判中心主义和对抗式诉讼模式有必然联系,并且还有一系列环环相扣的制度和规则作为支撑。我国既缺乏英美式预审制度赖以生存的法律文化土壤和能确保其有效运作的配套机制,也不存在与其相契合的价值取向和诉讼结构,因此,我国目前不宜植入该制度。Anglo- American Preliminary Examination, which is not in the charge of trial judge, can prevent not only abuse of prosecutorial power but also trial judge's prejudgement, but it is deeply rooted in antagonistic political legal culture, has a necessary connection with the concept that human rights and procedural justice are particular important, centralism of adjudication and adversarial system, what's more, it has series of supporting systems and regulations. In China, here is not only deficient of either law cultural for Anglo - American preliminary examination to survive in or supporting systems, but also lack of value orientation or lawsuit structure fitting it, thus, it is impractible to implant it into present Chinese criminal proceedings.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28