检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:闫瑞[1] 闫胜军[1] 李晋超[1] 李欣欣[1] 杨鑫芳[1] 赵富才[1] 郭青霞[1]
机构地区:[1]山西农业大学资源与环境学院,山西太谷030801
出 处:《山西农业大学学报(自然科学版)》2013年第2期109-113,共5页Journal of Shanxi Agricultural University(Natural Science Edition)
基 金:国家自然科学基金(41071345)
摘 要:为使土壤普查的土壤质地数据合理重用,采用分段三次Hermite插值方法、三次样条插值方法和线性插值方法3种土壤质地转换模型进行岔口流域土壤质地粒径间地转换,并与流域内各土种的实测土壤粒径值对照,通过均方根误差RMSE值和决定性系数R2值,评价了3种土壤质地插值转换模型的精度。结果表明,分段三次Hermite插值函数在描述粒径分布模型上最为理想,三次样条插值函数效果最差,线性插值函数介于两者之间。In order to reasonably reuse the survey data of the soil texture, the conversion of the soil grain size of different soil textures in Chakou watershed were studied with three different models, piecewise cubic Hermite interpolation mod el, cubic spline interpolation model, and linear interpolation model. The accuracy of three models was determined and evaluated based on the RMSE and R2 values which were obtained from comparing the model values with the field survey values. The results showed that, the piecewise cubic Hermite interpolation model was the most accurate one, followed by linear interpolation model. Cubic sp[ine interpolation model was not effective enough.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15