从生态语言学批评看“生态”与“环境”之辨  

The Debate Between ““Ecological” and “Environmental” from the Ecolinguistic Critical Perspective

作　　者：赵奎英[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东师范大学文学院,山东济南250014

出　　处：《厦门大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2013年第5期9-19,共11页Journal of Xiamen University(A Bimonthly for Studies in Arts & Social Sciences)

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"生态语言学和生态文学;文化理论研究"(1213ZW007);教育部项目"语言与生态"(09YJC751054);山东省社科项目"西方自然语言观与当代生态诗学;美学的语言哲学基础建构"(09CWX708)

摘　　要：在当今生态文学与生态美学研究界,存在着有关"生态""环境"孰优孰劣的辨析与争论。从生态语言学批评的角度对这种辨析与争论进行梳理分析,可以发现"生态"优于"环境"一词的原因,以及对"环境"中的人类中心主义进行批评的诸种可能。当今的"生态"与"环境"之辨对于生态话语构建和生态观念确立有着重要作用。生态语言学批评作为生态语言学研究的一种主要范式,它通过对语言系统和语言运用中的生态或非生态因素的批评分析,为语言的深生态化进程,并最终为生态环境问题的改善或解决做出努力。生态语言学批评的一项重要内容是批判考察语言词汇系统中的人类中心主义,它因此可以为我们分析当今的"生态"与"环境"之辨,为我们反思生态文学、美学理论话语自身的生态或非生态特征提供依据。In today＇s research of ecological literature and aesthetics, there is a debate about＂ ecological＂ and＂environmental＂. Analyzing this debate from the ecolinguistic critical perspective, we can find the reason using the word ecological is better than that of environmental, the possibility criticizing the anthropocentrism underling the word of environment, and the significance of today＇s debate on the＂ ecological＂ and＂ environment＂for the construct of ecological discourse and the establishment of ecological concept. As one kind of ecolinguistic research paradigm, ecolinguistic criticism makes efforts to prompt the deep ecological process of language, and finally to improve ecological environment problems through criticizing the ecological or non-ecological factors in language system and language use. One important content of ecological criticism is to criticize the anthropocentrism in vocabulary system, and so it can cast light and provide basis for our analysis of today＇ s debate, and for our reflection on ecological literary and aesthetic theory discourse itself.

关 键 词：生态语言学批评 “生态”与“环境”之辨 生态批评 生态美学 

分 类 号：H0-05[语言文字—语言学] I01[文学—文学理论]