G-BOND和Ⅰ-BOND自酸蚀粘结剂治疗牙本质过敏症疗效观察  

Curative effect observation for G-BOND and I-BOND acid corrosion caking agent in the treatment of teeth feel allergy

作　　者：李齐齐 

机构地区：[1]浙江省绍兴市口腔医院综合科,绍兴312000

出　　处：《口腔医学》2013年第9期627-629,共3页Stomatology

摘　　要：目的比较G-BOND、I-BOND自酸蚀粘结剂与常规抗敏药物极固宁治疗牙本质过敏症的疗效差异。方法将270颗牙本质过敏症的牙齿随机分为3组,分别采用G-BOND自酸蚀粘结剂、I-BOND自酸蚀粘结剂和极固宁3种药物进行脱敏治疗。观察治疗后即刻、1个月的临床疗效及随访6个月的远期疗效。结果在治疗后即刻、1个月时G-BOND组和I-BOND组与常规药物对照组比较,组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。但是治疗后6个月,G-BOND组和I-BOND组的远期疗效更为理想,其总有效率的降幅值小于对照组(P<0.05)。结论 G-BOND组和I-BOND组的近期疗效肯定,远期疗效也较为理想,随着时间的推移其临床疗效持续较久。Objective To compare curative effect of two acid corrosion caking agent in the treatment of teeth feel allergy and anti-al- lergic medicines Jiguning. Methods 270 teeth on hypersensitive were randomly divided into three groups, and treated by three medi- cines seperately. They were observed after treatment immediately, 1 months of clinical curative effect, and were followed up for 6 months of forward curative effect. Results After treatment immediately, 1 months G-BOND group and I -BOND group and routine drug compared to the difference between groups was statistically significant（P 〉 0.05）. But in one month after treatment, G -BOND group and I -BOND group of forward curative effect is more ideal, the total effective rate decline in value is less than that in control group（P 〈 0.05）. Conclusions G -BOND group and I -BOND group of recent curative effect affirmation, forward curative effect is relatively ideal, with the passage of time the clinical curative effect for longer.

关 键 词：自酸蚀粘结剂 牙齿感觉过敏症 脱敏治疗 

分 类 号：R781.23[医药卫生—口腔医学]