罚金刑适用若干问题研究  

Study on the Adaptability of the Fine Punishment

作　　者：李洁[1] 

机构地区：[1]吉林大学法学院,吉林长春130012

出　　处：《吉林大学社会科学学报》2000年第5期20-26,共7页Jilin University Journal Social Sciences Edition

摘　　要：我国 1 997年刑法大幅度增加了罚金刑的适用规定 ,但司法实务中存在的应罚不判、判而不缴、数额失衡等问题 ,导致了司法有失公正、法律判决有损法律权威的后果。原因有二 :在立法上 ,我国罚金刑规定以并科为主 ,以选科为辅 ,但没有规定罚金刑的换刑制度 ,导致罚金刑的执行存在问题 ;在理论上 ,对扩大罚金刑适用的价值目标、并科时罚金刑与自由刑的关系等问题研究的不够细致。改善罚金刑现状应从如下方面入手 :明确罚金刑立法意图、统一罚金刑适用标准。The criminal law laid down in 1997 in our country added a large number of articles on fine punishment. But in judicial practice such troubles are created as no penalty for the should be fined, no submission from the fined, and imbalance of the sum of the fines. This leads to unjust sentences which are quite harmful to the legal authorities. There are two reasons for this: in legislation, our fine system concentrates on combination punishment, and takes the selective punishment as an auxiliary, but does not stipulate a punishment exchange system for fining, thus creating troubles in the enactment of the fine system. And in theory, researches on the value objective of expanding fine range, as well as on the relationship between the combination punishment and the free punishment, are not very thorough. Improvement should be made in the following ways: making clear the legal intention of the fine punishment, standardizing the applied criteria, and increasing the awareness of practicing the fine system.

关 键 词：罚金刑 并科制 易科制度 刑罚缓和化 刑法 立法 

分 类 号：D924[政治法律—刑法学]