艾尔克·鲁尼亚与历史哲学的未来  

Eelco Runia and the Future of the Philosophy of History

作　　者：吕和应[1] 

机构地区：[1]四川大学历史文化学院,成都610064

出　　处：《学术月刊》2013年第10期161-169,共9页Academic Monthly

摘　　要：艾尔克·鲁尼亚是荷兰历史哲学界的新锐,他借助精神分析理论探究历史哲学的相关问题,提出历史哲学应该由"怀特式的表现主义"转向某种"思辨的"历史哲学。鲁尼亚发展了"并行运作"、"在场"、"转喻"等概念,这些概念既挑战了柯林武德的"重演论",又挑战了海登·怀特和安克斯密特的"叙事主义历史哲学"。鲁尼亚的新历史哲学产生了重要的影响,但也受到詹金斯这样的学者的质疑和批评,而且这种新历史哲学很难与多米尼克·拉卡普拉的创伤理论划清界限。就此而言,鲁尼亚的新历史哲学是否能代表西方历史哲学的未来方向尚有疑问。Eelco Runia is on the cutting edge of philosophy of history in the Netherland. Based on theories of psychoanalysis, he explores the related issues in the philosophy of history, and points out that Whitean representationalism should be replaced by some kind of ＂speculative＂ philosophy of history. Runia develops some concepts such as parallel processing, presence and metonymy, which challenge both Collingwood＇ s re-enactment theory and the narrativist philosophy of history represented by Hayden White and Frank Ankersmit. Runia＇ s new philosophy of history is also questioned and criticized by other scholars such as Keith Jenkins, although it has a significant impact, and this new philosophy of history is difficult to draw a line with Dominiek LaCapra＇s trauma theory. In this regard, it is questionable whether Runia＇s new philosophy of history can represent the future direction of western philosophy of history.

关 键 词：艾尔克·鲁尼亚 精神分析理论 新历史哲学 

分 类 号：K01[历史地理—历史学]