检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵佃强[1]
出 处:《南京晓庄学院学报》2013年第4期56-60,122,共5页Journal of Nanjing Xiaozhuang University
摘 要:当下的"中国现当代文学史"书写尽管非常繁荣,但给人的总体感觉是不够理想。文学史的书写可以分为"教材型"和"学术型"两种类型,它们之间有共同性,但在意识形态性、文学史观、书写目的等方面有很大差异,应该充分重视尊重这种差异以形成互补,从而从整体上提高文学史书写的整体水平。Today the compilation of the modern and contemporary Chinese literature history seems very prosperous,but the overall achievement leaves much to be desired. The most important reason lies in the lack of typology perspective in most writings of the literary history. Writings of literary history can be divided into'teaching'type and'academic'type. Despite commonality between them,there exists big difference between the two types in the ideology,perspective of literature history,writing purpose and so on. Greater importance should be attached to respect these differences to form a complementary situation,which will promote the level of writing of literary history as a whole,and produce the really satisfying literature textbooks.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145