检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:钟英才[1] 胡伟文[1] 周飞渡[1] 陈星明[1]
机构地区:[1]湖南省浏阳市人民医院肛肠科,湖南浏阳410300
出 处:《中国肛肠病杂志》2013年第9期14-16,共3页Chinese Journal of Coloproctology
摘 要:为观察保肛手术治疗低位直肠癌的疗效及患者术后生活质量,回顾性分析行保肛手术与传统Miles术治疗的低位直肠癌患者的临床资料,其中行保肛手术46例(保肛组),行传统Miles术14例(Miles组),观察两组患者平均手术时间、术中出血量等指标;术后随访36个月,观察患者术后生存率、复发率和生活质量评分。结果显示,两组患者在平均手术时间、术中出血量、术后复发率和生存率等方面差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05),但保肛组在生活质量方面显著高于Miles组(P〈0.05)。结果表明,在严格掌握手术适应症的前提下,治疗低位直肠癌行保肛手术可行。Abstract This study was to observe the clinical efficacy of sphincter-preserving surgery for patients with low rectal cancer and their postoperative quality of life,a retrospective study was carried out on the data of low rectal cancer treated with sphincter-preserving surgery and Miles surgery. There were 46 cases (sphincter-preserving group )undergoing sphincter-preserving surgery and 14 cases(Miles group) receiving conventional Mile's procedure. Both groups were observed for average operation duration and intraoperative bleeding volume and so on. After operation a 36 month follow-up was done for survival rate, relapse rate and scores of quality of life in both groups The results showed between both groups there was no signifi- cant difference in average operation duration, intraoperative bleeding volume, survival rate and relapse rate( P 〉0.05), however, sphincter-preserving surgery was superior to Miles surgery in improving the quality of life for patients( P 〈0.05). It is concluded that sphincter-preserving surgery for low rectal cancer is feasi- ble,but with strict control of surgical indications.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117