检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张思泉[1] 刘华锋[2] 张玉娟[3] 周可幸[1] 韩加裕[1] 颜成敏[1] 刘寿荣[1] 朱明利[4]
机构地区:[1]浙江中医药大学附属杭州市西溪医院重症监护病房,杭州310023 [2]浙江中医药大学附属杭州市西溪医院统计室,杭州310023 [3]浙江中医药大学附属杭州市西溪医院普外科,杭州310023 [4]浙江中医药大学附属杭州市西溪医院检验科,杭州310023
出 处:《中华危重症医学杂志(电子版)》2013年第4期24-29,共6页Chinese Journal of Critical Care Medicine:Electronic Edition
基 金:浙江省医药卫生科技计划项目(2013KYA170);杭州市科技局资助项目(20110733Q04)
摘 要:目的探讨肝硬化患者发生自发性肠球菌性腹膜炎(SEP)的危险因素、临床特点及预后。方法搜集2005年1月至2011年7月收住杭州市第六人民医院的自发性细菌性腹膜炎(SBP)患者共332例进行回顾性分析,其中肝硬化并发SEP患者(SEP组)30例,其他病原体所致SBP患者(对照组)302例。分别评估两组患者的临床特点及预后。结果与对照组相比,SEP组中有近期胃肠道出血史、3月内应用抗菌药物史、近期胆道感染史、腹部手术史或中心静脉置管史的患者较多,且肝功能Child-pugh评分较低(P均<0.05)。其中,7 d内上消化道出血为发生SEP的独立危险预测因素(β=1.621,RR=5.3,P=0.005)。SEP组30 d病死率(43.3%,13/30)远远高于对照组(18.9%,57/302)(χ2=9.812,P=0.002),而感染性休克是SEP组患者死亡的独立危险预测因子(β=-3.25,RR=8.7,P=0.004)。结论肝硬化患者并发SEP预后较差。近期有胃肠道出血提示患者为肠球菌感染,应注意预防并及时治疗感染性休克。Objective To investigate the risk factors, clinical characteristics and prognosis of spontaneous enterococcal peritonitis (SEP) in cinlhotic patients. Methods The retrospective cohort study was conducted in cirrhotic patients with ascites admitted to our hospital from January 2005 to July 2011. A total of 332 cases presented with spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) were enrolled in the study, including 30 cirrhotic patients with SEP (SEP group) and 302 cases with SBP which caused by other bacterial infections (control group). The clinical manifestations and prognosis of the two groups were evaluated respectively. Results Statistical differences were noted in recent upper gastrointestinal bleeding or biliary infections, antibiotics within three months, history of abdominal surgeries or central venous catheter placement between the two groups (all P 〈 0.05). Compared with the control group, Child-pugh scores were significantly lower in the SEP group (P 〈 0.05).Upper gastrointestinal bleeding within 7 days was an independent high-risk prognostic factor for cirrhotic patients with SEP (β = 1.621, RR = 5.3, P= 0.005). The 30-day mortality in the SEP group was obviously higher than that in the control group (43.3% vs 18.9%)(x2 = 9.812, P= 0.002), and septic shock was an independent prognostic factor for mortality in cirrhotic patients with SEP (β =-3.25, RR = 8.7, P = 0.004). Conclusions The prognosis of cirrhotic patients with SEP was poor. The recent gastrointestinal bleeding may indicate enterococci infection in patients, thereby septic shock should be prevented and cured in time.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.147