为什么要学科“本土化”?——价值焦虑、主体身份与文化政治  

The Reason of Disciplinary Nativization ——the Anxiety of Value、Subjective Identity and Cultural Politics

作　　者：展宁[1] 邵培仁[1] 

机构地区：[1]浙江大学传播研究所,浙江杭州310028

出　　处：《江苏师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2013年第5期118-123,共6页Journal of Jiangsu Normal University：Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：浙江省哲学社会科学重点研究基地成果

摘　　要：中国今天的学科本土化发展因应晚清以来的中学与西学关系问题,在全球化的情境下又面临着确立主体身份的焦虑。费孝通先生的学术路径及其"文化自觉"说为我们提供了获得"中国"叙述主动性的一种逻辑,其旨在对消解主体和传统的全球化的抵抗;"价值中立"话语从韦伯到帕森斯的演变提醒学科本土化需要确立"我们"的立场,首要的就是解决"身份"的问题,在对"世界观"的确立中实现真正的范式革命。为使中国大陆传播学科获得合法性表述,需要"打破传播学科重做传播学史"的思路,以期跳出西方学科领域和学院体制的束缚,让西方学科要解决的根本问题与我们当下经验相关联,在阐释西方中观照自己的历史境遇。The nativization of Chinese disciplines carries on the issue of relationship between ＂Chinese learning＂ and ＂Western learning＂ since the late Qing dynasty, and faces the anxiety of identity in the context of globalization. Fei Xiaotong＇s academic o- rientation and his ＂cultural self- consciousness＂ offer us the logic of getting the narrative initiative of ＂China＂, and aim at form- ing the resistance to globalization which dissolves the subject and its tradition. The evolution of value neutrality discourse from Max Weber to Talcott Parsons warns that we need to solve the issue of identity firstly in order to establish our stands, and only in the establishment of world view can the real paradigm revolution achieve. In order to let the Communication discipline of Main-land China gain legitimacy, an idea of ＂break communications discipline and restudy the history of American communications＂ illustrated aiming at getting rid of the shackle of western disciplines and college institution. The fundamental problem of western disciplines should be associated with our current experience, and we should return to our own historical circumstance by interpre-ting western history.

关 键 词：学科本土化 文化自觉 价值中立 立场 身份 

分 类 号：C3[社会学]