检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《齐齐哈尔医学院学报》2013年第18期2789-2791,共3页Journal of Qiqihar Medical University
摘 要:目的探讨优质护理服务在鼻咽癌放疗患者中实施的意义。方法选取30例实施优质护理后的鼻咽癌放疗患者为观察组,回顾性选取30例在实施优质护理前的鼻咽癌放疗患者为对照组。观察组以优质护理服务工作模式为框架,实施全程优质护理服务;对照组用常规的护理方法实施护理。对比两组患者住院期间放疗不良反应发生率和出院时对护理服务的满意度。结果观察组患者口腔黏膜急性放射性反应,张口困难、放射性皮炎、情绪反应等放疗并发症的程度均明显优于对照组,组间比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);观察组患者的满意度96.67%,对照组80%,两组比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论优质护理对于鼻咽癌患者放疗过程中不良反应的临床改善效果满意,能够有效地改善口腔黏膜反应、张口困难、皮肤及情绪等不良反应,并能提高患者的满意度。Objective To explore the significance of the high quality care for patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma received radiotherapy. Methods Patients ( n = 30 ) withnasopharyngeal carcinomareceived radiotherapyand high quality carewere characteristic as observation group, another 30 nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients those who received radiotherapy but didn 't receive high quality care were characteristic as control group. Comparing the incidence of adverse reactions of radiotherapy and satisfaction to nursing services. Results Theoccurrence of acute radiation reaction of oral mucosa, trismus, radiation dermatitis and emotional reactions for observation group were superior tothe control group, differences between the two groupswere statistically significant (P 〈 0. 05 ). Satisfaction rate of observation group (96. 67%) wassignificantlyhigher than that of control group (80%). Conclusions The quality care could improve the clinical effect and satisfaction, reduce the occurrence of adverse reaction of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma received radiotherapy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3