不同治疗方法在中晚期贲门癌中的治疗效果比较研究  

The Comparative Study of Different Methods in Treatment of Advanced Gastric Cancer

作　　者：邹庆伟[1] 蒲艳[2] 蒲敏[2] 

机构地区：[1]泸州医学院附属医院,四川泸州646000 [2]泸州医学院附属中医医院

出　　处：《中国医学创新》2013年第29期36-37,共2页Medical Innovation of China

摘　　要：目的:进一步研究和比较单纯手术、单纯胃左动脉介入化疗和综合治疗方法在中晚期贲门癌中的治疗效果,从而为临床治疗提供借鉴。方法:选取本院2008年12月-2011年12月收治的138例中晚期贲门癌患者,根据治疗方法的不同将患者分为3组:单纯手术组(46例)、单纯胃左动脉介入化疗组(46例)和综合治疗组(46例)。结果:在1、2、3年生存率上组间比较,单纯胃左动脉介入化疗组患者的生存率均最低,综合治疗组均最高,且3组之间两两比较差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:在临床治疗中晚期贲门癌的实践过程中,采用综合临床治疗方法临床优势明显,是临床治疗中晚期贲门癌的可靠选择。Objective： To further study and compare the differences of the clinical treatment effect of advanced gastric cancer, so as to provide reference for the clinical treatment. Method： One hundred and thirty eight cases of advanced gastric cancer were selected in the authors hospital from December 2008 to December 2011, and all cases were taken for retrospective analysis. Result： In the comparison of survival rate in 1 years, 2 years and 3 years between three groups, only the left gastric artery interventional chemotherapy treatment group was lowest and comprehensive treatment group was highest. The difference were statistically significant between the three groups （P〈0.05） . Conclusion： In the clinical treatment process of advanced cardiac carcinoma, comprehensive treatment is significant. So it is a reliable choice of clinical treatment for advanced cardiac carcinoma.

关 键 词：单纯手术 单纯胃左动脉介入化疗 综合治疗 中晚期贲门癌 

分 类 号：R735.2[医药卫生—肿瘤]