经桡动脉径路与股动脉径路行全脑动脉选择性造影的对比研究  被引量:3

A comparative study of cerebral angiography via transradial versus transfemoral approaches

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:史沛[1] 茹凤娟 赵毅[1] 王恒[1] 李甫[1] 杨红[1] 

机构地区:[1]河南省郑州大学第四附属医院介入科,郑州450044 [2]河南省新乡市第二人民医院普外科,453000

出  处:《白求恩军医学院学报》2013年第5期391-392,共2页Journal of Bethune Military Medical College

摘  要:目的探讨经桡动脉径路行全脑动脉选择性造影的可行性和安全性。方法全脑动脉选择性造影患者93例,按入路血管不同分为桡动脉组(54例)和股动脉组(39例),对比其穿刺成功率、造影成功率、穿刺时间、手术时间、X线透视时间、术后制动时间及并发症发生率。结果两组穿刺成功率、造影成功率、穿刺时间、手术时间、X线透视时间及并发症发生率均无统计学意义(P>0.05),桡动脉组术后制动时间短于股动脉组(P<0.01)。结论经桡动脉径路行全脑动脉选择性造影安全可行,且能显著减少患者术后制动时间。Objective To evaluated the feasibility and safety of transradial versus transfemoral approaches in cerebral angiog- raphy. Methods The cerebral angiography was performed in 93 patients and the patients were divided into transradial approach group ( n -- 54) and transfemoral approach group ( n = 39). The puncture time, the success rate of puncture and procedure, the operation time ,X-ray fluoroscopy time, postoperative braking time and complication rate were compared. Results There were no significant differences in the puncture time, the puncture success rate and procedure success rate, the operation time, the X-ray fluoroscopy time and the complication rate between the two groups( P 〉0.05). The braking time was significantly shorter in tranradial approach group than that in transfemoral artery group( P 〈 0.01 ). Conclusion Transradial approach for cerebral angiography is safe and feasible and can significantly reduce the braking time.

关 键 词:脑动脉造影术 桡动脉 股动脉 

分 类 号:R743[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象