语言磨蚀新问题——回归假说质疑  

New issues in language attrition: The regression hypothesis

作　　者：于中根[1,2,3] 

机构地区：[1]河海大学外国语学院,江苏南京210098 [2]浙江越秀外国语学院,浙江绍兴312000 [3]南京邮电大学通达学院,江苏南京210023

出　　处：《南京邮电大学学报（社会科学版）》2013年第3期76-83,共8页Journal of Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目"中国英语学习者英语否定句磨蚀的回归和阈值假说实证研究"(11YJC740138);江苏省教育厅高校哲学社会科学基金指导项目"外语磨蚀回归和阈值假说实证研究"(2013SJD740005);2012年度第二批江苏省博士后科研资助计划"中国学生英语语言磨蚀的回归和阈值假说研究"(1202112C);南京邮电大学通达学院教学改革项目(重点)"外语磨蚀回归和阈值假说与民办高校英语教学改革"(TD02011JG02)

摘　　要：雅克布逊回归假说是语言磨蚀领域中传统的假说,随着语言磨蚀研究进一步深化,相当多的学者认可了该假说。然而,比较失语症幼儿的语言习得和磨蚀的研究结果未能证实回归假说,对健康人群的研究同样未能证实回归假说,记忆学和心理学领域也没有理论足以支持回归假说,回归假说还有很大的验证空间,它也可能并不符合语言磨蚀规律。Jacobson＇ s regression hypothesis is a traditional hypothesis in the field of language attrition. With the deepening of the However, a study by language attrition research, a considerable number of scholars have endorsed the hypothesis. comparing aphasia children＇ s language acquisition and attrition failed to confirm the regres- sion hypothesis, nor did the studies on healthy people. Besides, there are not adequate memory and psychology theoretic support for regression hypothesis. The hypothesis still needs to be proved and it could be argued not to be consistent with the attrition law.

关 键 词：语言磨蚀 回归假说 记忆 遗忘 

分 类 号：H0-06[语言文字—语言学]