商业秘密权利边界之廓清  

On the Scope of Trade Secret Right and Perfection of Enterprises' Protection Strategy

作　　者：王骏[1] 

机构地区：[1]浙江大学宁波理工学院

出　　处：《知识产权》2013年第10期76-82,共7页Intellectual Property

基　　金：宁波市软科学项目(课题编号2012A10086);宁波市哲学社会科学学科带头人培育项目(课题编号G12-XK15);国家科技支撑计划课题(2012BAF12B00)

摘　　要：廓清商业秘密权利边界是有效保护商业秘密的前提。宽泛的、不加识别的所谓"强保护"并不可取。"秘密性"、"价值性"和"管理性"是界定商业秘密权的基点。竞业禁止协议不能泛泛地阻止员工择业,而只在防止披露和使用商业秘密的程度上才有其意义,这就要求明确区分商业秘密与员工的知识、技能。美国判例法区分"直接使用"与"间接使用"的做法值得我们在判断侵权"使用"时借鉴。诉前救济的多样化运用有利于制止侵权、阻止秘密外泄。信息公开时必须充分注意冲突利益的平衡。The determination of the scope of trade secret right is the premise to provide effective protection for trade secret. The so-called ＂strong protection＂ is too broad and ineffective, so this kind of protection is undesirable. Confidentiality, value and manageability are the basis to identify the scope of trade secret right. The non-compete agreement can not prevent employees choosing occupations broadly except to prevent disclosing or using the trade secret.Thus, it is necessary to distinguish the trade secret from the employees＇ own knowledge and skill. The judge of direct and indirect use of trade secret in the U.S. case law can offer the use for reference to China when determining trade secret infifngement. And the diversity of pre-litigation relief is helpful to prevent infringement and the leakage of trade secret. We should also pay full attention to the balance of conflicting interests when disclosing information.

关 键 词：商业秘密 权利边界 竞业禁止 诉前救济 信息公开 

分 类 号：D922.294[政治法律—经济法学]