检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐迪锋[1]
机构地区:[1]西南政法大学,重庆401120
出 处:《西南政法大学学报》2013年第5期82-89,共8页Journal of Southwest University of Political Science and Law
摘 要:当事人概念在学理上经历了从实体到程序转变。直至目前,程序当事人概念已经在理论上得到广泛认同,然而我国立法与司法实践对于当事人概念的处理却尚未与理论接轨,理论、立法和实践三者间的关系显得混乱。基于程序当事人概念在具体司法操作过程中的不足,我们应提出和引进并且完善当事人更换制度予以弥补并构建一套完整的当事人理论和制度。Academically, the conception of litigant underwent the transformation from substantive litigant to procedural litigant. Till now, the idea of procedural litigant has been widely accepted theoretically, but China' s legislation and judicial practice does not interpret the conception of this term in line with the theoretical circle. The term is quite confusing in theory, legislation and practice. Due to the deficiency of applying the conception of procedural litigant in specific judicial work, this paper proposes that the system of replacement of litigants shall be introduced to supplement and construct a complete litigant theory and system.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.226.52.76