检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]天津中医药大学人文管理学院,天津300073
出 处:《中国高等医学教育》2013年第9期18-19,56,共3页China Higher Medical Education
基 金:天津市哲学社会科学研究规划一般项目(TJJX11-067)资助;天津中医药大学校级科研课题(XJ201201)资助
摘 要:采用生命意义感量表、核心自我评价量表以及简易应对方式量表对350名医学生进行了问卷调查,探讨医学生生命意义感现状及其与核心自我评价、应对方式的关系,为提高医学生生命意义感提供依据。结果表明:(1)医学生生命意义感偏低,其中37.46%的医学生明显缺乏生命意义感,57.78%的医学生对生命意义与目标不确定;(2)医学生生命意义感与核心自我评价、积极应对方式均呈显著正相关,与消极应对方式呈显著负相关。(3)逐步回归分析表明,核心自我评价和积极应对方式是预测生命意义感的主要因素。A total of 350 medical students were investigated by using PIL, CSES and SCSQ, so that the relationship of life meaning, core self-evaluations and coping style were explored among medical students to provide evidences for improving life meaning among them. Results : The life meaning was generally low among medical students. 37.46 % of them are apparently lacking life meaning. 57. 78% of them are unsure of their life meaning and the target. There was significant positive correlation between life meaning and core self-evaluations, positive coping style, and there was a significant negative correlation between life meaning and negative coping style. Regressive analysis demonstrated that core self-evaluations and positive coping style are the key predictive factors for life meaning.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28