检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:格佛海[1,2] 孙忠娟[1,2] 凌学忠[1,2]
机构地区:[1]清华大学技术创新研究中心,北京100084 [2]清华大学经济管理学院,北京100084
出 处:《科学学与科学技术管理》2013年第11期116-125,共10页Science of Science and Management of S.& T.
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(71072010;71073092);教育部博士学科点专项科研基金(20100002110061)
摘 要:企业以提升技术能力为意图的战略性技术并购,其最终目的仍是获取经济收益。采用1998—2011年的财务数据,基于显著性检验,分析了2001—2008年间中国企业技术并购的经济绩效。结果表明:(1)从增长和衰退统计看,中国企业在技术并购后多数实现了营业收入增长,2/3的企业实现净利润和每股收益的提升,1/3的企业实现了净资产收益率的提升;(2)从并购前后经济绩效的均值看,营业收入显著提升,净资产收益率显著降低,净利润和每股收益无显著变化;(3)从年值看,仅营业收入显著提升,净资产收益率呈降低趋势但并不显著。Although the aim of strategic technology acquisitions is to improve the technological capabilities of the acquirer, its ultimate aim is also to get economic returns. Based on significance-test, this paper investigates the economic performance of Chinese enterprises' technology acquisitions between 2001 and 2008, using 1998-2011 fi- nancial data. The major results are shown as follows. (1) According to the growth and recession statistics, almost all of the Chinese enterprises achieved revenue growth after technology acquisition, two-thirds of them attained the increase in NP & EPS and only one-third of them achieved ROE increase. (2) As for the mean of variables, the revenue increased and the ROE decreased significantly and there were no significant changes in NP & EPS (3) Considering the annual values, the revenues increased significantly, and the ROE decreased in trend while the trend could not be supported by significance-test. The findings imply that the effect of technology acquisition is shortdated, only on manifest in revenue, whereas the enterprises' capabilities have not been improved.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28