检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:曹小玲[1] 张群霞[1] 卢岷[1] 谢昭鹏[1] 张欲晓[1] 彭剑萍[1] 郑元义[1]
机构地区:[1]重庆医科大学附属第二医院超声科,重庆市400010
出 处:《临床超声医学杂志》2013年第10期688-690,共3页Journal of Clinical Ultrasound in Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨超声弹性成像评分法与面积比值法在乳腺肿块鉴别诊断中的临床应用价值。方法对158个乳腺肿块行弹性成像检查,先用超声弹性成像评分法进行评分,然后分别测量弹性图像和二维图像上肿块的面积,计算其面积比。所有肿块均获得病理结果。结果超声弹性成像评分法诊断乳腺良恶性肿块的敏感性、特异性、准确性分别为93.9%、92.1%、92.4%,面积比值法诊断乳腺良恶性肿块的敏感性、特异性、准确性分别为84.0%、87.1%、71.1%。两种方法联合诊断的敏感性、特异性、准确性分别为93.9%、98.4%、97.5%。结论联合应用超声弹性成像评分法与面积比值法可提高鉴别乳腺良恶性肿块的准确性,具有较高的临床应用价值。Objective To explore the clinical value of improved-5 scoring system and area ratio of ultrasound elastography in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions. Methods A total of 158 lesions underwent ultrasound elastography and hardness scoring with improved-5 scoring system. The area in the elastographic image and B-mode image were measured and the area ratio was then calculated. The pathological results of all lesions were obtained. Results The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of improved-5 scoring system in the diagnosis of breast lesions were 93.9% ,92.1% ,92.4%, respectively. For area ratio method, they were 84.0%, 87.1% ,71.1%, respectively. For the combination of improved -5 scoring and area ratio, they were 93.9% ,98.4% ,97.5% ,respectively. Conclusion The combination of scoring and area ratio can improve the accuracy of ultrasound elastography in the differential diagnosis of breast lesions and has a high clinical value.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.116.112.164