检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广东省佛山市第一人民医院,广东佛山528000
出 处:《天津护理》2013年第5期388-390,共3页Tianjin Journal of Nursing
摘 要:目的:探讨临床护理路径在耳鼻喉科中的实施效果。方法:选取1 108例鼻窦炎鼻息肉、声带息肉或囊肿、慢性化脓性中耳炎患者为路径组,实施临床护理路径;969例未实施临床路径患者为对照组,实施常规护理,对两组患者的住院天数、总住院费用、患者的满意率和术后并发症进行比较分析。结果:路径组住院天数比对照组的缩短,差异有统计学意义(P=0.00),但总住院费用两组比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),患者满意率及术后并发症无明显改变。结论:临床护理路径缩短了耳鼻喉科患者的总住院天数,降低住院费,提高了工作效率。Objeetive..To evaluate the applied effect of clinical pathway of nursing in otorhinolaryngologic diseases in our hospital. Methods.. 1108 cases which adopted clinical pathway of nursing with chronic sinusitis and nasal polyps, vocal cord polyps or cyst and chronic purulent otitis media and were included in the test group, accordingly, 969 patients with the same diseases who didn't adopt clinical pathway of nursing were included in the control group. The hospitalization days, expenses, satisfaction of the patients and complications of two groups were compared and analyzed. Results: The hospitaliza-tion day of the test group was obvious less than that of the control group. However, there were no statistical difference in the hospitalization expenses and satisfaction of the patients and complications (P〉0.05) between two groups. Conclusion..Application of clinical pathway of nursing can contribute to reduce the hospitalization days, medical expense of otorhinolaryn- gologic patients, and improve work efficiency of nursing.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222