论欺诈、胁迫之民事救济——兼评《合同法》之二元规定  

Civil Remedy for Deceit and Coercion

作　　者：柳经纬[1] 李茂年[1] 

机构地区：[1]厦门大学法学院,福建厦门361005

出　　处：《现代法学》2000年第6期73-77,共5页Modern Law Science

摘　　要：对于欺诈、胁迫行为之民事救济 ,从罗马法至现代各国立法 ,大多数采取撤销主义 ,我国《民法通则》及三部旧合同法采无效主义之一元规定 ,新《合同法》则采可撤销与无效之二元规定。本文认为 ,从二元规定到采可撤销主义之一元规定 ,应是我国合同法的价值取向。For the remedy of the deceptive conduct and coercive conduct, from Roman Law to most of the current countries' Laws adopt the rescinded principle, but our country's Civil General Provisions and the Old Contract Laws adopt the invalid principle, the New Contract Law adopts both of the principles. Compare with the invalid principle, the rescinded principle can better protect the victim, and further respect the will of the contracted parties, upholding the economic order. So the authors think our country's contract law should adopt the rescinded principle only.

关 键 词：欺诈 胁迫 合同法 无效主义 撤销主义 民法 

分 类 号：D913[政治法律—民商法学] D923.6[政治法律—法学]