检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李秀霞[1] 张文秋[1] 邢小玲[2] 马志辉[1]
机构地区:[1]唐山市,河北联合大学附属医院神经内科,河北省063000 [2]河北联合大学校医室
出 处:《中国医药》2013年第11期1573-1574,共2页China Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨脑梗死后双眼复视患者康复训练中不同时间介入主动运动的效果。方法将40例脑梗死后双眼复视患者按发病住院时间分为2组,发病1-5d住院的患者设为观察组,共24例,住院当天常规药物等治疗的同时开始做主动运动的视物操训练;发病≥6d住院的患者为对照组,共16例,住院当天常规治疗的同时也开始做主动运动的视物操训练。经过10d常规治疗加主动运动的视物操训练后,评估2组患者复视恢复情况。结果观察组复视恢复有效率达95.8%(23/24),对照组复视恢复有效率为62.5%(10/16),2组比较差异有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论脑梗死后双眼复视患者康复训练中,主动运动在发病1-5d介入优于5d以后介入。Objective To compare the different effects of initiative movement intervention at different time- points for binocular diplopia patients after cerebral infarction. Methods Forty binocular diplopia patients after cer- ebral infarction were divided into two groups. Observation group included twenty-four cases who were in hospital since the symptoms emerge within five days. They began to do initiative movement video subjects practice when they accepted the conventional treatment. Sixteen cases who went to hospitals more than five days after thesymptoms emerge were as control group. They began to do initiative movement video subjects practice when they accepted the conventional treatment. After doing initiative movement video subjects practice with conventional treatment for ten days, the rehabilitations of the two group were compared. Results The diplopia recovery rate in observation group was 95.8% (23/24) and the diplopia recovery rate in control group was 62.5% (10/16) ; the difference was statis- tically significant ( P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion Initiative movement intervention in the rehabilitation of the cerebral in- farction patients after binocular diplopia has better effect within five days than five days later.
分 类 号:R743.3[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.139.239.16