检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙国祥[1]
出 处:《法学论坛》2013年第6期40-50,共11页Legal Forum
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究项目"经济犯罪刑事政策研究"(11YJA820062)阶段性研究成果
摘 要:刑事政策与刑法功能上的差异,导致刑事司法中贯彻刑事政策与适用刑法一直被认为处于一种矛盾、紧张的状态,学界或将其视为水火难容,或将其看作互不来往的平行线。如何厘清刑事政策与刑法的关系,人们分歧巨大,远未达成共识。实际上,在刑事法治的基本原则框架下,基于实质违法性的分析视角,刑法与刑事政策可以实现融合与统一。一方面,刑法的适用需要刑事政策的襄助,刑事政策的渗透不可避免;另一方面,刑事政策的强势需要受到一定的约束。刑事政策的诉求融入至犯罪论体系,促使刑法安全性的机制与政策灵活性的因应达至某种妥协与平衡,以携手成为现代刑事法治的实践性逻辑。Difference between criminal policy and function of criminal law leads to conflict and tension in implementing criminal policy and criminal law, which has been considered as fire and water or parallel lines. How to clarify the relationship between criminal policy and criminal law is far from a consensus. In fact, in the framework of basic rule of criminal law, criminal law and criminal policy can realize the integration and unification based on analysis from the perspective of substantive illegality. On one hand, the application of criminal law needs the aid of criminal policy, which penetration is inevitable; on the other hand, strength of criminal policy should be subject to certain constraints. Its aspirations should be integrated into criminal theory sys tem, making security mechanism of criminal law and policy flexibility reach some kind of compromise and balance, in order to work together to become the practical logic of modern criminal law.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222