契合与殊异:甘青藏民族地区刑事政策之调适  

Similarities and Differences:Adaptation of the Criminal Policy in the Ethnic Minority Areas of Gansu,Qinghai and Tibet

作　　者：刘慧明[1,2] 张立雪[3] 

机构地区：[1]兰州交通大学法学研究所,甘肃兰州730070 [2]北京大学法学院,北京100871 [3]中国科学技术大学公共事务学院,安徽合肥230026

出　　处：《兰州交通大学学报》2013年第5期33-37,共5页Journal of Lanzhou Jiaotong University

基　　金：国家社科基金项目<甘青藏等民族地区犯罪治理模式研究>(10BFX036);甘肃省高校研究生导师科研项目<创新社会管理语境中的犯罪控制研究>(1204-04)之阶段性成果

摘　　要：在目前我国的刑事政策体系中,宽严相济刑事政策是基本刑事政策,"严打"刑事政策和"两少一宽"民族刑事政策则为具体刑事政策。甘肃、青海和西藏都是多民族聚居的省份,刑事政策的适用有其特殊性和复杂性。既要廓清三种刑事政策的契合之处,更须认知其殊异之别,应参酌犯罪态势、社会情势、民族心理、民间习惯法等因素,创新刑事政策在民族地区的践行理路。In the present criminal policy system of China, Tempering Justice with Mercy is a basic criminal policy, while Strike-hard criminalpolicy and the criminal policy of Less Arrest, Less Death Penalty and More Leniencyu are specific policies. The provinces of Gansu, Qinghai and Tibet are areas inhabited by dif- ferent ethnic groups, where the practice of criminal policies has particular and complex features. So it is necessary to know the similarities of the aforementioned three criminal policies, and more importantly, to understand their differences. Factors, like crime situation, social situation, national psychology, and local customary law must be taken into account in order to innovate the ideas to practice criminal policies in mi- nority areas.

关 键 词：刑事政策 宽严相济 严打 两少一宽 民族地区 

分 类 号：DF623[政治法律—刑法学]