检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:余艳[1,2] 崔焱[2] 刘玉环[1] 沈敬敬[3] 蒋春燕[1]
机构地区:[1]上海交通大学医学院苏州九龙医院护理部,江苏苏州215021 [2]南京医科大学护理学院,江苏南京210029 [3]南通瑞慈医院护理部,江苏南通226010
出 处:《解放军护理杂志》2013年第20期53-56,共4页Nursing Journal of Chinese People's Liberation Army
摘 要:目的比较平衡计分卡(balanced score carol,BSC)和传统绩效考核法在护理绩效管理中的应用效果。方法 2011年5月至2012年10月选取300名经历过传统绩效考核法至少1年、且后续实施BSC考核法1年以上的护士,采用问卷调查其对两种绩效考核方法的接受度及实施效果的评价。结果被调查护士对BSC考核法的接受度和满意度明显高于传统考核法,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);除对促进团队协助外,被调查护士认为BSC考核法在明确科室组织及个人目标、提高学习及工作主动性、保障护理安全、提高工作效率、优化护理文化氛围、可操作性等29个方面均优于传统考核法,差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.01)。结论 BSC作为一种新兴的考核手段及目标管理工具,具有客观公正、可操作性强等优势,在护士绩效考核中有良好的应用前景。Objective To compare the application effects of the balanced score card (BSC) and traditional assessment in the nursing performance appraisal. Methods The study questionnaires were applied to a total of 300 nurses from May 2011 to October 2012,who had the experience of being assessed by both of the traditional method and the BSC in performance appraisal. Acceptability and implementation effect were compared for the traditional method and the BSC. Results Acceptability and implementation effects for nurses with BSC were much better than that of nurses with traditional method (P〈0.05). The investigated nurses all considered that application effects of BSC were much better than that of the traditional assessment, such as clearing department and personnel objectives, improving working initiatives and efficiency, ensuring nursing safety, and optimizing nursing culture and operation, et al. (P〈0. 01). Conclusion As a new evaluation method and management tool, the BSC obtained a higher reputation in nurse's performance appraisal management for its more objective,equitable,reasonable,and fair.
分 类 号:R197.323[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.44