检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:马庆凯[1]
机构地区:[1]浙江农林大学外国语学院,浙江杭州311300
出 处:《铜仁学院学报》2013年第6期79-84,共6页Journal of Tongren University
基 金:浙江农林大学科研发展基金资助项目(2351001053)阶段性研究成果
摘 要:认知语言学兴起后,介词多义性的研究成为一个热点。在Lakoff(1987)等学者早期研究的基础上,Tyler与Evans(2003)提出了原则性多义网络理论,首次提出介词义项认定的原则,为介词over提出了更加简约的多义网络,影响深远。本研究是从认知语法的视角去审视反思该理论,发现其存在一些问题:一是前提错误,将介词与其邻近词合作产生的意义加给了介词本身,其结果就是依然给介词划分了过多的本不属于介词的义项;二是在具体做法上存在实例与义项错配的现象。研究认为,在介词多义性的研究中,需要对介词的语义本质正本清源,如此方可得出更为合理的多义理论。The research on the polysemy of prepositions becomes hot with the rise of cognitive linguistics. Based on the early research of Lakoff (1987), Tyler and Evans (2003) put forth the theory of principled polysemy network, which points out the principle of preposition affirmation for the first time. The theory, which gives a more concise polysemy network for the proposition "over", has far-reaching influence. The paper rethinks the theory from the perspective of cognitive grammar and reveals some problems in it: the first problem lies in the preposing error, that is, the meaning of the preposition is derived from the combination of itself and its neighboring preposition, which adds extra meaning to the preposition that does not have; the second problem is caused by the wrong match between the example and the actual meaning of the preposition. It is proposed that the nature of meaning of the preposition needs to be carefully examined. In this way, more reasonable theories could be generated.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145